A Conversation about God, Goddess, or the Absence Thereof

Lone Jensen

January 12, 2003

Let me begin with a question: how do you really feel when I say the word God? Do you cringe a little, shrink from the word and think to yourself: “Oh, I do hope she is not going fundamentalist on us, or going off the deep end!“ Do you wish I used that word less? Or do you inwardly applaud and hope that finally someone is going to speak out loud and unashamedly what you already believe? Are you a closet Theist? Or do you worship the Goddess and wish I would use the feminine pronoun all the time? Or are you neutral, mildly curious? Few, I have discovered in my years as a UU minister, few are really neutral about God. No matter what we believe about God or the absence thereof there is often high emotion when we hear God-talk. Whether God is there or not the tension surely is. What is this all about?

Perhaps we are afraid of the word because we confuse it with dogma or with the kind of theology that binds us to a narrow mind and even narrower creed. But the absence of God has as many theological implications as does the presence of the All Mighty. So short of becoming a kind of fast food religion and ask each customer: “Do you want God with that?” we really have to find a way to speak to each other honestly and with respect. That is both our challenge and our special form of UU grace. And I do understand the hesitations, the anxiety and the anger that some of us feel about the God that may have been thrust upon us. Not to mention the way God is being used in certain circles to justify all manner of prejudice and phobias. No, I do not want to be mistaken for someone who claims to know that God does not like uppity women or gay men or whatever other personal prejudice they espouse. But I am not willing either to have God hijacked by the religious right. Maybe the real questions are much simpler: Does what we think about God make our lives better? Does it make us more loving and forgiving? Does it inspire us to act? If not perhaps we had better examine the quality of our theology.

Now God is for some of you a word that has outlived its usefulness. That doesn't mean you are doing bad theology nor would I suggest that simply believing in a God would make you a better person. In fact there are some images of God I find frankly abhorrent. Once the word God in my mind was so laden down with centuries of dogma, with woman hating, sexuality denying, burn in hell rhetoric that I too cringed whenever I heard it.

But for some time now it has felt at times as if God was there. Not the easy God of childhood or the God of Dogma but a simple presence of calm grace with no face and ultimately no words either. God for me is useful shorthand pointing to what is ultimately unknowable. It is a word that once again hold power and meaning for me years after I made my peace with it. It took a long time to get to this resting place and this faith journey is far from over. You may end up in a different place. In fact I trust each of us will. That is the beauty of this sacred community. We honor the differences among us. So if I tell you about my own religious journey I do not expect you to follow in my footsteps. What I do hope is that you will consider and honor your own life as if it was a sacred text. Within which you will find both beauty and meaning. Let us begin with the God of our childhoods.

"My easy God is gone, the one I've known since childhood,” writes the poet and we nod. Yes, for most of us that God is gone. "We walk alone now," we say, but "not as terrified as when he held our hands."

The God of childhood for me was an odd mixture. He was at once a kind, loving grandfatherly figure that I might still long for and at the same time a stern, angry and often demanding judge who was all-seeing. He knew, just like Santa Claus, when we were good and when we were bad. A terrifying image for a child who is not altogether sure about where such a God ends and his and her parents begin. And I was told that such a God unlike their parents have absolute powers and can do absolutely anything. What does that do to you?

Rev. Terry Sweetser tells his story: "I was seven years old when I had my first encounter with theology. My mother made a batch of fudge, placed it in the refrigerator and decreed it could not be sampled until after supper. I was not pleased. I contrived every scheme I could imagine to sneak some, but someone always seemed to be lurking around the kitchen.

“At about four o'clock, I got what seemed like an unbelievable break. My mother and sister had to go to the store, leaving me alone for a little while. Mother must have been reading my mind because she gave me a warning on her way out. ‘Just because I'm not here,’ she said, ‘don't you think you are alone with the fudge. God is watching you.’

“The word theology means god-study. As they drove off, I was studying hard. It did not take me long to conclude that I was a seven year old atheist. Boy, did that fudge taste good. Unfortunately for me mother had counted the pieces, and the recount on her return showed a deficit of three. When asked how I could brazenly have taken the fudge in front of God, I said, ‘I don't believe in God.’ My ever practical mother responded, while administering my first spanking: ‘It would be in your best interest to act as if God were there.’ Well maybe. It depends upon who you think God is. As Sweetser wrote, his mother used God as a disciplinary tool with which to develop a conscience. Our early images of God are crafted out of adult words that seen through a child's eyes may take on fantastic shapes. But those images change as we grow and learn, as we question and doubt. My early God was lost at fourteen when I went for confirmation, an event that in Denmark was similar to a Bat Mitzvah, a huge feast, a rite of passage that meant you were now an adult. By then I was reading the Bible myself and as I was taking some of the words literally I wanted, perhaps expected at least a small miracle, some supernatural event that would show me that God was indeed whom I had been taught he was. A voice out of the darkness would have done very nicely. But much as I waited and prayed there was no answer, only a vast emptiness. My words it seemed only disappeared, were blown away in that stormy night of the soul some of us call adolescence. So on the festive day as I knelt with the others, dressed in a white silk brocade dress and my first high heels and holding a red rose I said to myself: “OK, God this is it, now show me!" But of course nothing happened at all, and as the priest put the dry oblate in my mouth I felt indeed confirmed, but as an atheist, a very young angry and rebellious one. Perhaps there was also a sense of betrayal because if one could not count on God then what could one count on or believe? It is difficult to look back through the years and not smile a little at the arrogance of that young woman who thought that she deserved a miracle, a special spectacular event just for her to show her that she wasn't alone in the Universe. This is a journey many of us in this room have made. Again I quote my colleague Terry Sweetser: "I doubt there is a person who hasn't wanted to believe in a stern and grandfatherly God. Like all human beings we are afraid of life and would have liked to know for sure that we are loved and cared for by God and his son. But what I discovered was that I could not believe it. And so with fear and trembling I confronted my oneness in the universe. Only then could I painfully begin to learn that there is wonder in that oneness that can be shared."

I agree. Most of us have at one time or another confronted our aloneness. In the process we learn what kind of God we do not believe in. As Sam Kean found: "Any God with self esteem would not need me to sing praises to his/her holy name. Nor would a provident God, like a forgetful CEO, need to be reminded to intercede and grant clemency to some little one caught in the pain and the tragedy that are an inescapable part of the human condition." Again I agree. Worship to me means lifting up that which is of worth and God surely does not need our praises though gratitude in general may be good for our mental health. We made these images of Gods who needs our sacrifice. It is easier to understand a kind of barter God than to try to follow someone’s teachings. Remember that not even one of the founders of the great religions were Orthodox. Abraham left Ur in Chaldea and it’s city Gods behind. Jesus wasn't born a Christian, Gautama wasn't born a Buddhist nor was Mohammed born a Muslim. All were spiritual seekers, mystics, prophets, troublemakers, critics of the establishment of their day. This is what Ralph Waldo Emerson is referring to when he said:

"In the first generation the men were golden and the goblets were wooden. In the second generation the men were wooden and the goblets golden." The images we got from our old faiths are sometimes best lost. They are as wooden gods, worthless when examined closely. Herb Richardson, a conservative theologian once said: "I will tell you what it means to believe in the authority of the Bible. If you ask me if I believe what is on page 313 of the Bible I will say Yes. And then I will see what is on that page." Such blind faith is incompatible with a love of truth and reason. As is the image of God as a judge who condemn us to Hell. That idea, apart from being likely un biblical, is frankly immoral to me. So it was with a sense of liberation that I rejected the word God, threw it out along with hell fire and brimstone and other human nightmares. But I have to admit that something was missing. It was hard to find a satisfactory word to replace it with. In Baghdad I had learned yet another name for God, Allah. As I understood it, in Islam God was not human, but a force, immense as the Universe itself. Such a God could indeed, as the vast expanse of the desert itself, inspire both fear and awe. A God so much like nature appealed to me but I could no more accept a literal Islam than I could a literal Christianity. So for years I was outside any organized religion. When I entered the Unitarian Church in Baton Rouge some 30 years ago it was as a passionate and firm humanist. No God-talk for me! I was allergic to it, and would break out into a heated argument whenever the G word was mentioned. I was one of those members who gave the minister a good argument and I fear occasionally a very hard time. And I was not alone. This was in the seventies and to be a Unitarian was still for many the same as not believing in God. It may actually be a more a matter of style and a bit of a generation gap. Suzanne Meyers believes that many UUs born before 1946 desire most of all intellectual stimulation. They want sermons full of ideas, concepts and issues. They are most comfortable with a style of presentation that is objective, detached and emotionally neutral. Rev. Arvid Straube called it the “lecture, clarinet solo and discussion style of Sunday Service.” Boomers and those behind them want celebration and spiritual renewal. They prefer sermons that deal with feelings, personal dilemmas, life passages and spiritual growth. They like a presentation that is subjective, personal, warm and vibrant. The older generation often associates the words "celebration" and “Spiritual Renewal” with emotionalism. They are likely to say that they distrust religious services that contain emotionalism. Boomers say they do not like Sunday services that are dry, boring, cold and feel like college lectures. And yes, I know these are generalities! And that it is impossible to do both in one service.

With Seminary my reaction to God changed. But it began long before that. When women began to reclaim the divine nature, to look for or re-invent ancient Goddesses I began to see another side of that feared G-word, once “ess” was added to it. It wasn't that I suddenly decided that God is female, although if seen as a creator that would make more sense, as she could give birth to the universe as only the female sex can give human life, but what changed me was the discovery that the word could feel positive, affirming, empowering. Ultimately though, I could not be a literalist here either. Goddess might be more palatable to me than God but the problem remained, I could not see the Ultimate Reality, prime mover or creative force as being either human or of either sex. The All Embracing Universe would have to do as my religious metaphor.

But that would not quite do either. If the word God designates “that about which we are ultimately concerned" (as Paul Tillich says) then I asked: “who or what is my God?” We will, I believe, worship something or someone. The Unitarian A Powell Davies saw God as “the aliveness of reality, the breath of life in the world.” Dana Greeley once challenged Unitarian Universalists to: “Acquaint thyself at first hand with divinity.” What he meant was find out who or what your God is, do theology, understand first hand what it is you give your life to and determine if it is worthy. Henry Nielson Wieman called God the creative force for good. There is in fact no shortage of definitions that many of us can agree with. But they may be missing the point. At one of Paul Tillich's very abstract lectures at Harvard on the nature of God, woman rose to ask a question: “Dr. Tillich," she said, “it is well known that psychoanalysts have an exceedingly difficult time with patients who know psychoanalytical theory. Do you think God has the same problem with theologians?"

There is also a story told at the University of Chicago that a famous debate was held between Charles Hartshorne and Paul Holmer. Hartshorne a metaphysician in the tradition of Alfred North Whitehead took more than an hour to construct an elaborate ontological argument for the existence of God. Finally Paul Holmer, a philosopher convinced that common language contains the essence of wisdom arose to give his reply. He paused a long time and then very slowly said: “God is great and God is good. And we thank him for our food.” And that is all I have to say about God. Asking if there is a God I can believe in, is a bit like asking: what is the meaning of life? Ultimately it is unanswerable. Meister Eckhart thought that "the idea of God can become the final obstacle to God." Sam Kean writes that we misunderstand the task: “God is not an object to be known or a problem to be solved by human intelligence, but it is the ground within which we live, move and have our being."

Mystics have always known this. “The paradox of authentic mysticism is that something as ordinary as the first blue flower of spring growing out of the snow suddenly opens a vista to eternity. In the twinkling of an eye our perspective shifts and we see that the ordinary is miraculous."

It is perhaps not that God does not speak but that we do not know the words. Let me end with this story: “At forty two, two years after her divorce and the tragic death of her only daughter, Susan was painfully trying to begin again. In her grief she retreated to a small cabin in the woods. One night she had an extraordinary experience: ‘I woke to the coolness of the cabin, the wood stove having spent its heat. I decided to start up another fire in the hope of keeping the room warm the rest of the night. It was so peaceful, both externally and internally. I was in love with the moment, standing in the dark, in this small cabin, in this quiet draw: waiting for the flames to make union with the wood; looking out at the thin moon leading stars in a friendly chase through the trees; listening to the waterfalls pouring over the rocks. I became aware of a song of universal grace coming from the room, right where I was standing. It's was a song felt more than heard, coming from even deeper than the heart. It was still with me when I curled down into the bed and cast off, smiling, into the gentle dark river.’ Tao Te Ching said: "Darkness within darkness. The gateway to all understanding. The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.”